Loading...
topic
ГЛАВНАЯ  /  PUBLICATIONS  /  THE FIRST INVESTOR-STATE DISPUTE AGAINST IRAN

Publications

The First Investor-State Dispute Against Iran

The First Investor-State Dispute Against Iran

The first investment arbitration against the Islamic Republic of Iran was put to rest on 15 October 2014 by an arbitral tribunal operating under the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) Arbitration Rules (Turkcell İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş. v. The Islamic Republic of Iran).

The tribunal held that the activities of the claimant (Turkcell İletişim Hizmetleri A.Ş., a Turkish telecommunications company) in Iran, were not an “investment” qualifying for protection under the applicable Turkey-Iran Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT).

The claimant was the majority shareholder in a consortium that bid successfully in a tender process for a GSM licence in 2004. When the claimant resisted a new legislation in Iran requiring it to surrender the majority of its shareholding in its activities to Iranian entities, the GSM license was eventually awarded to a South African telecommunications company. This led the claimant to initiate arbitration proceedings against Iran in 2008, alleging that its contractual rights on account of its successful bid in the tender process and a related license agreement, were a protected investment under the Turkey-Iran BIT which had been unlawfully expropriated by Iran.

The claimant also invoked the fair and equitable treatment, full protection and security and most favoured nation clauses of the BIT. The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claims holding that it had no jurisdiction because there was no “investment” within the meaning of the BIT. Further, the Tribunal ordered the claimant to reimburse Iran at an amount of approximately USD 1 million which constituted Iran’s arbitration costs. The Tribunal’s award found disagreement by the arbitrator who was appointed by the claimant.

Despite having signed the award, said arbitrator issued a dissent finding that the claimant was the holder of an investment subject to protection by the Turkey-Iran BIT.

This content is solely for general information purposes. None of the information herein should be relied on or substituted for specific professional advice regarding a particular matter or situation and no person should act or refrain from acting on the basis of the information contained in this brochure without first obtaining advice from an attorney. A.G. Erotocritou LLC is not engaged in rendering legal services or advice by providing the information contained in this brochure. © A.G. Erotocritou LLC, a Cyprus lawyers’ limited liability company regulated by the Cyprus Bar Association, with registration number HE 326006. Address: 1 Arch. Kyprianou and Ayiou Andreou Str, Loucaides Building, 6th floor, 3036 Limassol Cyprus I website: www.erotocritou.com I Telephone: +35725370101 I Fax: +35725370102 I email: info@erotocritou.com

Cyprus has reduced the threshold for approving Schemes of Arrangement to simple majority, making them an attractive alternative to court sanctioned debt restructurings.    
In tandem with the legal position under English  law, albeit with certain structural variations which will be addressed in this article, fraudulent trading in Cyprus is both a civil and criminal concept ...
In the context of construction contracts, a performance bond may be described as a species of security which offers an effective legal and financial safeguard in the form of a guarantee which, at the ...
Whilst it is of crucial importance that a company’s Articles of Association (AA) and Shareholders’ Agreement (SHA) should be such as to ensure that their respective provisions are compatible, it would ...
The essence of this article is to afford due consideration to the legal ramifications of an assignment of rights (insofar as it relates to loan agreements), effected by an “original” lender to an “incoming” ...