Search Publications
London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules

London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) Rules

The London Court of International Arbitration (“LCIA”), one of the world’s leading arbitral institutions, has recently published its new Arbitration Rules which will govern LCIA arbitrations commenced after 1 October 2014. The most innovative changes found in the 2014 Arbitration Rules include the following:

With new Article 15.10, an LCIA tribunal is required to issue its award, as soon as reasonably possible, following the last submission of the parties. Similarly, Article 10.2 permits the LCIA Court to revoke an arbitrator’s appointment if the arbitrator fails to conduct the arbitration with “reasonably efficiency diligence and industry”.

Further, new Article 5.4 requires potential arbitrators to declare that they are “ready, willing and able to devote sufficient time, diligence and industry to ensure the expeditious and efficient conduct of the arbitration”. · Under new Article 22.1, an LCIA tribunal may consolidate arbitrations in two situations prescribed by the said provision. This is a further attempt of the 2014 Arbitration Rules to increase the efficiency of arbitral proceedings and address any existing concerns on time and costs.

In addition, the 2014 Arbitration Rules introduce a mechanism for the appointment of an emergency arbitrator by the LCIA Court upon application by a party, to conduct emergency proceedings pending the formation or expedited formation of the LCIA tribunal. This provision addresses situations where urgent interim relief is required even before the constitution of a tribunal or an expedited tribunal. · The most interesting provisions in the 2014 Rules, however, are the ones relating to parties’ legal representation, not yet seen in any other institutional arbitration rules. For example, under Articles 18.2 to 18.4, parties are required to notify the tribunal of the names of their legal representatives, and of changes to their legal representatives. Such change requires the approval of the LCIA tribunal, which can withhold an approval where the change could “compromise the composition of the Arbitral Tribunal or the finality of any award.”

Further, Articles 18.5 to 18.6 and the Annex to the 2014 Arbitration Rules govern the conduct of legal representatives in a further attempt to promote procedural fairness. The new 2014 Rules of Arbitration of the LCIA seek to address the challenges of modern arbitration practice in a perfect degree. Their effect, therefore, would be to retain the institution as one of the most popular for international arbitrations, including international arbitrations seated in Cyprus. The old and new LCIA Arbitration Rules are available online.

This content is solely for general information purposes. None of the information herein should be relied on or substituted for specific professional advice regarding a particular matter or situation and no person should act or refrain from acting on the basis of the information contained in this brochure without first obtaining advice from an attorney. A.G. Erotocritou LLC is not engaged in rendering legal services or advice by providing the information contained in this brochure. © A.G. Erotocritou LLC, a Cyprus lawyers’ limited liability company regulated by the Cyprus Bar Association, with registration number HE 326006. Address: 1 Arch. Kyprianou and Ayiou Andreou Str, Loucaides Building, 6th floor, 3036 Limassol Cyprus I website: www.erotocritou.com I Telephone: +35725370101 I Fax: +35725370102 I email: info@erotocritou.com

Related Publications

The Covid-19 pandemic created an unprecedented situation for the lives and livelihoods of people from every socioeconomic background. In response to the pandemic, Cyprus introduced a series of humanitarian ...
A relatively less-known procedure, the examinership framework, may hold the key to the survival of corporations faced with the financial consequences of the Covid-19 outbreak.
A.G. Erotocritou LLC has been invited by Burges Salmon to contribute the Cyprus chapter to a comprehensive paper in relation to the regulation of cryptoassets. 
The District Court of Limassol has ruled that a minority shareholder may pursue an oppression of minority petition, irrespective of whether the underlying company had a positive value for distribution ...
The right to pursue a private criminal prosecution is an effective and frequently used weapon in the arsenal for combatting white-collar crime in Cyprus.