Loading...
topic
HOME  /  PUBLICATIONS  /  RESTRUCTURING FOR COMPANIES IMPACTED BY THE CASH FLOW FREEZE

Publications

Search Publications
Restructuring for companies impacted by the cash flow freeze

Restructuring for companies impacted by the cash flow freeze

Recent developments, sanctions and capital controls have disrupted finance arrangements and bond issuance going through Cyprus, with many innocent parties getting caught in the crossfire.

Bond issuers and debtors based in Cyprus find themselves unable to service their debts despite their strong liquidity position, whilst bondholders and other creditors stand by helpless, witnessing actions by more aggressive creditors that might risk the overall chance of recovery.

In this article, we explore 2 mechanisms offered under Cyprus law, which help businesses shield against the effects of a potential default and protect creditors against the effects of an uncontrollable insolvency. The purpose of both these mechanisms is to salvage companies as a going concern by restructuring their obligations.

Scheme of Arrangement

A scheme of arrangement is a Court-sanctioned agreement between a company and its creditors to restructure the debts owed by the company, whilst allowing it to continue as a going concern. Schemes of arrangement offer a flexible, operational, creative and customised mechanism of debt management, which shields companies from potentially inevitable insolvency.

Following the amendments to section 198 of the Cyprus Companies Law, Cap. 113, the necessary creditor threshold required to approve a scheme of arrangement is that of a simple majority in value (i.e. 50%+) for each class of creditor voting for the arrangement.

Schemes of arrangement may be pursued by the distressed company itself, or any of its creditors and shareholders.

In order to pursue a scheme of arrangement, the following steps are follows:

  • Firstly, the scheme of arrangement will need to be drafted, together with the required explanatory statement and insolvency report. This step will usually entail assistance from both legal and financial experts.
  • Secondly, the scheme documents will be presented to the Court, which will consider its contents, issues of jurisdiction and the classification of creditors. If approved, the Court will authorise the convening of creditors’ meetings.
  • Thirdly, the affected creditors will be invited to vote on the proposed scheme of arrangement.
  • Finally, if a simple majority of creditors per each class of creditors approve the scheme of arrangement, the Court will consider the scheme’s fairness – taking into consideration the position of the creditors opposing the scheme – and, if satisfied, the Court will sanction the scheme of arrangement.

Once a scheme of arrangement is sanctioned by the Court, it becomes binding on all parties involved.

Finally, it is noted that schemes of arrangement may be pursued by companies already in liquidation, by their liquidator. However, a higher threshold is required for approval of schemes of arrangement in the context of liquidation (75% of creditors in value), thus making the procedure more approachable prior to entering, and as a step in avoiding, liquidation.

Examinership

Examinership is a Court restructuring procedure suitable for companies which are facing immediate financial distress but have reasonable prospects of survival. The Court appoints an examiner, who is a qualified insolvency practitioner, to propose a restructuring plan for the company’s debts, where (a) the company is, or is likely to be, unable to pay its debts, and (b) the company is not in liquidation, which will in turn salvage the company as a going concern.  

The main benefit of examinership is that it allows the distressed company to enjoy a temporary, 4-month (subject to extension) moratorium on claims by creditors, meaning that during the period of examinership, no claims by creditors can be advanced against the company. At the same time, no holders of charges will be precluded from appointing a receiver / manager over the company’s assets, and holders of any security or guarantee offered by the company will be unable to realise that security or guarantee (in part or fully) without the examiner’s approval.

During their appointment, the examiner, as well as any member, contributory, creditor or director of the company, may apply to the Court for directions on matters arising in the course of the examinership.

The Examinership procedure is commenced through an application to the Court, which can be filed either by the company, a creditor of the company, a guarantor of the company’s obligations or any member(s) of the company holding not less than 10% of its paid-up voting share capital at the time.

Once the restructuring plan proposed by the examiner is implemented, the appointment of the examiner and the moratorium offered to the company are terminated.

Related Publications

An overview of the EC Proposal for a Regulation on horizontal cybersecurity requirements for products with digital elements and its correlation with the existing data protection law under the General ...
In its recent judgment , the Supreme Court issued an interlocutory injunction to prohibit tenants from entering or possessing property, following the lapse of a contractual obligation to deliver free ...
Our firm has authored the Cyprus chapter of Lexology Getting The Deal Through: Asset Recovery 2023.
The Supreme Court has clarified that the courts' power to issue buy-out orders, in relation to the shareholding of oppressed shareholders, can only be directed against other shareholders or the company. ...
Following Cyprus's increasing role as an international dispute resolution center, a new Commercial Court is to be established to handle high-value commercial disputes litigated in Cyprus.